A macro lens allows for close up photos. Say you are shooting with a regular 50mm lens, then the minimum focal distance from lens to object being photographed is roughly 12-18 inches. A macro lens has a closer focal range, allowing the lens to be as close as maybe 6-8 inches. All of this depends on the quality and brand of the lens. But these numbers are close.
Taking a quick glance at the specs for the lens you are interested in, I would not consider this to be a true macro. My metric conversions aren't great, but I think 31.3cm is about 15 inches.
It is called a telephoto lens because of the 105mm length. That means that it is doing somewhat of a close up. The human eye is roughly the equivilant of a 50mm lens. Anything longer is like a telescope, and brings objects close.
I do like the aperture ratings on this lens. It goes from F2.8 to F45. The smaller the number, the larger the opening of the aperture. Kind of like wire gages.
The aperture affects the depth of field in a photo. The wider the opening(F2.8), the narrower the depth of field. This allows focusing on one object, and blurring the fore and backgrounds. The smaller the opening(F45) the wider the depth of field. Many objects will be in focus. For example, Ansel Adams shot with F64 and look at how much detail there is over the entire photo.
A great example of this is to use your eyes. When you are looking at something nearby and focusing on one object, your eyes are open wide. When you are looking in the distance with no real focal point, you are likely to squint.
I'm not here to bash any specific brand, but I will tell you that years ago, a friend bought a Sigma lens at the same time I bought a Canon lens. I still have my Canon, and he has a Canon now too. The Sigma got returned withing a few days.
Good shooting to you!