Question:
Is Photography a representation of Rape?
jc learner
2007-11-17 20:49:06 UTC
...
Eleven answers:
Agata
2007-11-17 20:55:57 UTC
you want pictures that represent rape or you want some ideas??? details...

http://search.deviantart.com/?section=browse&qh=boost%3Apopular+age_sigma%3A24h+age_scale%3A5&q=rape

some photos representing rape
candolim_imp
2007-11-18 05:31:58 UTC
Assuming you mean the violation and humiliation of people by treating them as objects in such a way, then no, it's not representative of rape. The term is used too frequently as an analogy when someone has been violated in some way or their human rights ignored. Rape is a violent, forced, sexual abuse of another human being, and cannot be compared to anything BUT rape itself.
captainsmiley_2084
2007-11-17 21:07:39 UTC
i wouldn't go that route in describing photography at all even if i kind of understand where your coming from. it seems what you mean is the non consensual capturing of a random person in a public/or private place should be considered a form of violation.

the problem with that idea is unless it depicts the person in a way other than what their true actions at the time of capture, it poses no harm to the person which is very different than what the term rape is widely classified as.

most photographers try to capture the true moment of reality. while others may alter the final photo differently its usually to inhance the mood not defy it.
wackywallwalker
2007-11-18 04:03:08 UTC
Photography is by no means rape and the least of the atrocities commited by early explorers and anthropologist. If you want to focus on any tragety perhaps focus on the intorduction of small pox or western ideologies/tools on indigenous people.
chris m
2007-11-18 00:19:42 UTC
Just to add some interest, rather than to answer the question directly, I thought I'd offer a poem written by Pope Leo XIII called Ars Photographica (On the Art of Photography) when he was still Cardinal Pecci in Perugia in 1867:



Ars Photographica



Expressa solis spiculo

Nitens imago, quam bene

Frontis decus, vim luminum

Refers, et oris gratiam.



O mira virtus ingeni

Novumque monstrum! Imaginem

Naturae Apelles aemulus

Non pulchriorem pingeret.



(Sun-wrought with magic of the skies

The image fair before me lies:

Deep-vaulted brain and sparkling eyes

And lip's fine chiselling.



O miracle of human thought,

O art with newest marvels fraught -

Apelles, Nature's rival, wrought

No fairer imaging!)
Regwah
2007-11-17 21:55:53 UTC
I have seen some, penetrating images. It depends on, how you want to deal, with your exposure. Is it long? Try to get people to open up, it's fun to look up friends. If you find yourself, developing a film, brush your teeth. Anyway, good luck with the hole rape thing, I guess. I couldn't come at the thought myself. Peace out.
Joseph, II
2007-11-17 20:58:13 UTC
No. It's a passive representation of an Image. Rape is something obtained by force...
anonymous
2007-11-18 00:09:38 UTC
Strange question, where did you get that one from ?



Do you mean in that it can invade the subject if the subject is unwilling?



My answer is a big question mark, I don't understand where you are coming from.
Antoni
2007-11-17 21:21:15 UTC
look up "photography" and "rape" on the web, then you will notice they are different things



a
Noah's Ark
2007-11-17 21:01:49 UTC
Thank you Joe, and i agree with you ,,,,, although i wonder what Princess Diana would say if she could answer this one !
gryphon1911
2007-11-17 22:34:32 UTC
Uh, no.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...