The 0.43 tells you, just multiply your lenses focal length with this number. So your 28mm becomes a 28 * 0.43 = 12.04mm, on your 50mm lens it's 50 * 0.43 = 21.5mm you still have to multiply by the crop factor. So your 28mm with adapter and crop factor (1.6) has the field of view of a 28 * 0.43 * 1.6 = 19.264mm lens hardly fisheye though there might be some barrel distortion it will be minimal.
To get the fisheye effect you need a genuine fisheye lens around 10mm with a crop sensor, not all 10mm lenses are fisheye most are rectilinear which corrects the distortion and reduces the field of view whilst doing the correction.
I have a Pentax 10 - 17mm fisheye lens, by the 17mm end the fisheye effect has virtually disappeared. At the 10mm end I get almost a 180° field of view. It's by far my least used lens, the only time I use it is when photographing cars very close. Depth of field is huge, basically everything from touching the lens to the horizon is in focus at f16.
You won't get that from an adapter, put it on a wide lens and you may just get a circular image, you'll get vignetting on most lenses, adapters are not the same as a dedicated lens.
Here are a couple of examples, Notice the lack of flare, you won't get that with an adapter, they will flare as well as vignette.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/chris-judge/2946928132/in/photostream
http://www.flickr.com/photos/chris-judge/3328805784/in/photostream
Using FD lenses on an EOS camera is not a good idea as your adapter will have to have a corrective lens in it so you get infinity focus and bang goes the best of any image quality. I use FD lenses all the time on my Micro 4/3 cameras and they are very good and cheap which is a rare combination, but on an EOS camera you loose that advantage. Though you may find an FD fisheye lens, they are rare, but were made.
Chris