Which Digital Camera should i use, for semi-professional photography?

Question

in your opinion which digital camera should i buy,
i want something that is pretty pro, can be uploaded onto my computer, is quick, easy to use, and probably an SLR.
-thank you.

Answer 1

I recommend to anyone seriously contemplating the purchase of a new digital SLR camera to consider these two primary questions:

1. How much money do you have to spend???? $500.? $800.? $1,500.? $2,500??

2. What level of photography do you aspire to "progress to" in the coming years ? (i.e. basic beginner, intermediate, or professional/business use).

For most beginners to intermediates I usually suggest one of these two manufacturers: Canon vs Nikon



1. Canon EOS Rebel model XSi. (Also known as the Canon 450D in Britain) The "kit" package comes with an 18-55mm zoom lens. The camera has pop-up flash, 12.2 Megapixels, and shutter speeds up to 1/4000th, 100-1,600 ISO sensitivity, 7 auto exposure Scene modes, PLUS Shutter Priority, Aperture Priority and Programmed Exposure Modes and Manual. It also has a 3 inch LCD screen, 3.5 frames continuous per second max., 9 point AF system, Live View Functioning and the ability to record photos in 3, 6 or 12 Megapixels PLUS numerous other great features found only on more expensive cameras. Wal-Mart is also selling them now for about $799. Sam's Club also has them for $729. I also think that Amazon dot com has them for around $650.



I bought one of these 6 months ago and use it as my "back up" camera. I absolutely love it. I have gotten some fantastic photos with it and cannot praise it enough. I routinely enlarge my photos to make 8x10's and 11x14 size enlargements with no noticeable distortion or loss of detail in the pictures.



2. Nikon D-90: If you prefer to use Nikon equipment I strongly recommend the Nikon D-90 which has 12.3 Megapixels, 3 inch monitor with Live View, 200-3,200 ISO sensitivity, 11 point AF system with Face Priority, 4.5 frames per second in continuous mode, 5 advanced Scene modes for auto exposure plus Shutter Priority, Aperture Priority, Programmed Auto plus Manual. The D-90 sells for around $900-950. (Body ONLY. The 18-55mm lens cost an additional $150.-175.) Typically, Nikon equipment is slightly more expensive than Canon equipment, but (having owned both Nikon and Canon cameras), I have seldom noticed BETTER quality results using Nikon equipment.



You might also consider the Nikon D-40 ($499) kit that comes with the 18-55mm lens. Another great choice is the Nikon D-60 kit ($649) which also comes with the 18-55mm lens. All of these Nikon's can be found at Best Buy or Amazon dot com for a very low price.



These selections are probably the best choices for any beginner to intermediate skill level, offering the most lenses and other accessories, dealers and places to purchase.



I strongly recommend that ALL beginners buy a good book on digital photography AND take a class or two from a Vocational school or Community Education Center in your area.

You can learn more about the technical specifications of each of these two cameras at these websites:

http://www.usa.canon.com

http://www.nikonusa.com



Good Luck

Answer 2

Like Morey said, for a semi-pro dSLR, your options are the Nikon D200 and the Canon 30D. The Nikon costs $1700. Add another $700 for a good lens. The Canon costs $1250. Again, add $700 for a good lens. (It's pointless to get a +$1000 body and slap on a bargain basement lens.) If those prices are too steep, you can get an entry level model by Nikon or Canon. A starter kit (including one lens) will set you back $800 for the Nikon D50 to $1000 for the Canon Rebel XT. I must vehemently disagree with the suggestions to consider the Sony R1. This camera has a nice lens but the camera also has some severe limitations. For one thing, it uses an electronic viewfinder with a 1/10th second delay. With action shots, that means you'll ALWAYS press the shutter button 1/10th second too late... in effect, it's useless for action. The same is true for all cameras with electronic viewfinders. I personally use a Nikon D200 with a Nikon 17-55mm as my main lens. Add a SanDisk 2GB Extreme lll memory card and a B+W MRC UV filter, and that's +$3000 dangling from my neck. And that's not to mention the other lenses and equipment in my bag. So be warned; semi-pro gear can get very expensive, very fast. The Nikon D50 or Canon Rebel XT might be more sensible.

Answer 3

> semi-professional photography?



Are you talking about semi-pro result or semi-pro work?

===

Even P&S can get semi-pro results these days. If you want to do semi-pro work (get paid), then you should think about investing in SLR type as they gives you the most flexibility (during a job).



You don't mention $$$. The Nikon D90 is very good camera. But if you don't want to spend too much money Nikon D40 also gets good reviews.





Good luck...



P.S. I only mention Nikon because that is what I use. Canon also have equivalent cameras (I just am not familiar enough to comment).

Answer 4

Canon Rebels are a great way to break into DSLRs (Digital Single Lens Reflex). They're pretty user friendly and moderately priced for a good digital camera.

Answer 5

I love my Kodak easy share I think it take a good quality pic

My friend thought my kids pic was done professionally it is the 10 meg

pixxel Hope I have been of some help Good Luck

Answer 6

you don't say how much you want to spend.get a Nikon.D300 is great...all Nikons are great..............Check the site.see what you can pay...remember, you have to buy lenses and a flash also....nikon site...

Answer 7

only buy canon for realz, best lenses best cameras, dont get a rebel though they are not worth it. an SLR is going to cost you big bucks. and yes if you want pro quality you need to get an SLR, but the fact is if you want a goodie its going to be a little complicated. Nikons suck, Kodak easy share sucks too. Talk to any real photographer and Canon is the ONE.