Help to choose between entry level DSLR's?

Question

I have decided to take up photography as a new hobby and I want to buy an entry-level DSLR camera. From my research, I have short-listed 3 models. They all kind of have the same features, so I would like your help in my decision process.
I don't need any fancy professional features or gimmicks (except for those that actually help the picture quality), I just need a reliable camera, that's easy to use and takes the best pictures possible. I also it to have an integrated image stabilizer.

The models are:
- Sony a290
- Nikon D3000
- Canon 1000D

All of these 3 can be had for about £320-£350. The Nikon is the cheapest, being available for close to £300.
If you have other models in mind, then please tell me, but I don't want to buy second hand cameras.
Thank you for your help!

Answer 1

Here they are side by side



http://www.dpreview.com/products/compare/side-by-side?products=nikon_d3000&products=canon_eos1000d&products=sony_dslra290&products=pentax_kr



I've also added the Pentax Kr simply the best entry level DSLR (DP Reviews words not mine), better sensor than all the others, ALL the functions you will ever need (Nikon 'cripple' their entry level models), can take any Pentax K mount lens made in the last 40 years, all will be image stabilised as it's built into the camera (As is the Sony). No extra to pay for IS when buying a new lens.



Pentax is the only one to offer Tav mode, you set the Aperture and Shutter Speed and the camera alters ISO, Time lapse built in, multi image built in. auto Ae Bracketing in case you want to try HDR photography, As I said ALL the functions, and the latest sensor, good low light performance with low noise.



In the case of Nikon you have to buy the more expensive AF-S lenses if you want auto focus.



I always buy my cameras from here in the UK



http://www.srsmicrosystems.co.uk/c/460/Pentax-K-r-Digital-Cameras.html



Usual disclaimer just a satisfied customer over many transactions, always cheaper than the High Street, everything arrives next working day by courier, hassle free guarantee, a genuine camera shop in Watford. Give them a ring they will advise you.



Chris

Answer 2

I have used Sony for around 3 years now. I like the in body image stabilisation, as already said, lenses requiring this cost more. I've looked for lenses for mine and have found (obviously) Sony, Minolta, Sigma, Tamron and, possibly limited Tokina.

My only gripe with Sony, is the odd design hot shoe. I have been assured by Hahnel and Interfit, that by mid year, a radio frequency flash trigger will be available.

If, in time, you find you can afford better quality, just remember that Sony have linked with what is arguably the finest lens manufacturer in the world, Zeiss.

Apparently, Sony also manufacture the sensors used by other manufacturers, Nikon being one. That should say something.

Answer 3

Only the sony has in-body stabilizer. Both Canon and Nikon take care of that in the lens (IS and VR)



Sony has, still, a rather limited lens and flash range which may be an issue if you decide to expand your kit.



The Canon and the Nikon are ageing entry models which explains their price. Go to a shop and handle both and see which one feels best to you.

Answer 4

I'd also suggest Pentax.



I'd also say think about second hand - the body will be the cheap bit, it is lenses that cost real money.

I'd look for a higher level body second hand rather than a cheap entry level model.



Sony models can use older minolta lenses so no real lack of lenses there - as long as you are happy with 2nd hand.



For prices look at www.camerapricebuster.co.uk

Answer 5

all these are good but if you get sony lens will be limited and if you buy nikon and canon you have to pay for image stabilisation. I am not well used to sony's image stabilisation but canon does the work brilliantly. If you use a tripod always it wouldnt matter much