You are all wrong, i have been professionally printing for 18 years. you are confusing PPI with DPI if you are saying 300 is as high as you should go. an image does not need more than 600 PPI (1200 PPI in some micro-printing applications) but a printer at 300 DPI is garbage, it looks like a blurred mess of ink. Now an epson r1800 for example can go from 720x1440 DPI to 5760 x 1440 DPI. take an image print it at 1440 DPI or even 2880, it looks good, ESPECIALLY with portraits. Organic images need nothing more than this, but when it comes to line are, secure imaging, vector printing, etc... 4880 is the way to go. You can go a bit higher than this like 5760 but that is all you need.
So please stop saying that printing in 300 DPI is enough, it is NOT, your eye CAN see the difference, very clearly infact.
Also, most printers do not mix colors, they spray but do not mix. Maybe some exotic continuous tone printers but even the pixma pro 9500 MK II that runs with 10 colors at 4880 DPI does not mix anything in the head, just places dots using a micro piezoelectric dropper for each nozzle to change the sizes of the drop size.
I have came to notice, when getting in to quality the variable dot size is very apparent in the quality, but when you have a printer the quality will not be perfect. I know many high end professionals stay away from 10 color for certain reasons with organic photos but when printing high quality vectors the more colors, the less apparent the dots, the harder it is to see the dots, the crisper the lines.
So, people say 600 ppi is good, i use 1440 ppi with detailed work as it is just easier to work with. When printing, use 5760 for the best quality or higher if you have it. Also, DPI is not the only factor, check out the epson printers with micro-piezo variable drop sizes, they have some very qood quality at even 1440 dpi.